The report summarizes comparative prices for neural-generated videos and outlines key factors that explain wide cost dispersion.

Key findings and price range

Analysis based on data from Gemini 3 and Claude shows examples where one neural clip costs 3 625 ₽ while another reaches 3 000 000 ₽.

Providers charging above 300k+ typically combine multiple services beyond raw generation, affecting final invoices and client expectations.

What buyers actually pay for

Price differences reflect not only model compute and licensing, but also layers of creative direction, post-production, and legal responsibility assumed by vendors.

Higher fees often cover project management, quality guarantees, content rights clearance and bespoke tuning specific to a client brief.

Market segments and roles

The market splits into low-cost automated generators, mid-market studios blending automation and human work, and premium agencies offering end-to-end delivery.

Top decile specialists focus on complex outputs, compliance, and integration with existing production pipelines, which explains substantially higher rates.

Methodology and caveats

The overview compiles observed offers and reported invoices; the author notes that a larger sample is required for definitive averages and trends.

Nonetheless, the assembled data provides a practical snapshot of current pricing dynamics across segments and service models.